• Spzi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And it provides your weapons industry with real life data from a large-scale conflict with equipment from multiple origins.

    And it advertises a competitors products as inferior, and yours as superior.

    I despise all these things, but from a purely economic viewpoint, this is interesting for business.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can blame those deaths on Putin.

        Ukraine wouldn’t need those equipment if Putin didn’t invade a sovereign nation.

        He can literally decide tomorrow to pull back and no deaths would follow anymore.

      • Spzi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but unclear what that implies. Some people say weapons kill people so we should not produce / supply weapons, expecting less people would die. Others point at aggressors using (their home made) weapons to kill people, pointing at the need to supply their victims, expecting less people would die.

        Comparing the track records of Russia (frequently invading and killing neighbors) and Ukraine (not so much) it’s easy for me to take sides. But the tragedy exists, which is why I despise all these things.