Huawei Nearlink launched, new wireless technology far ahead of Bluetooth
consumer.huawei.com
Today, Huawei officially launched a new generation of short-range wireless connection technology – NearLink. This technology brings together the collective collaboration of more than 300 leading enterprises and institutions at home and abroad. I

Compared to Bluetooth:

  • 60% lower power consumption
  • Six times higher data transmission speed
  • 1/30th the latency
  • 7 dB improvement anti-interference for a more stable connection
  • Twice the coverage distance, and
  • 10 times more network connections

US won’t benefit from this tech due to the US Huawei ban.

  • ExFed
    2·
    1 year ago

    And your argument is cherry-picked. Which is worse?

      • ExFed
        32·
        1 year ago

        Right. Okay, I’ll do your homework for you…

        You’re claiming that a handful of people pointed out some things Western governments were doing that were illegal according to said governments’ legal governing documents, but because of the way they did it, those governments (and citizens) are pissed off at them.

        I’m saying the systematic oppression of the free press, human rights, and the decades-long genocide of Tibetans and Uyghurs are perfectly legal according to the PRC.

        These aren’t even comparable. Keep trying.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          46·
          1 year ago

          Buddy, your country has an entire torture camp in Guantanamo on the land your regime annexed from Cuba where you disappear people in a middle of the night without any due process. Your country passed laws like the Patriot Act that allow the government to disappear citizens.

          Meanwhile, this is what China liberated Tibet from, and your Uyghur conspiracy theory has been thoroughly debunked many times.

          You’re right, these aren’t even remotely comparable. Keep trying.

          • ExFed
            1·
            1 year ago

            That history article you linked goes as far as the 1950s.

            Who’s debunked it? The CCP? Are they still sticking to the “reeducation centers” line? Have you been “reeducated”?

            There are some perverse arguments that let Gitmo exist. It’s a heated debate around whether the US Constitution extends to non-citizens. As usual, Wikipedia has a fantastic summary.

            … which is a debate that can occur in a diverse nation with a free press. Do you feel threatened because you’re arguing against Western Democracy on the Internet, a product of that same Western “regime”?

            Didn’t think so.

              • ExFed
                1·
                1 year ago

                Not defending. Admitting that evil things have been done to 780 people while at Gitmo. It’s a problem, and we’re working to fix it.

                But imagine being unable to admit there are millions of detainees in Xinjiang.

                That’s the difference between Western Democracy and an an authoritarian ethnostate. There’s no way to fix something you won’t admit exists.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
                  35·
                  1 year ago

                  LMFAO working to fix it. Sure buddy. Just like you’re working to fix all your migrant concentration camps for kids you’ve got on the border. That’s your western “democracy” in action. Concentration camps for kids. That’s what you’re all about.

                  Meanwhile, the claim that China is detaining millions of people in Xinjiang is so completely absurd that only an utter imbecile would believe it. Let’s just look at how much space would you actually need to intern one million people.

                  This is a photo of Rikers Island, New York City’s biggest prison. The actual size of a facility interning ten thousand people.

                  According to Wikipedia, “The average daily inmate population on the island is about 10,000, although it can hold a maximum of 15,000.” Let’s assume this is a Xinjiang detention camp, holding ten to fifteen thousand people. How many of these would it take to hold one million people?

                  Let’s do some math:

                  Rikers Size Rikers Prisoners One Million Uyghurs Size
                  413.2 acres (0.645 square miles) 10,000 to 15,000 43 to 64 square miles

                  In reality, one million people would probably take more space; all the supposed detention camps we see are much less dense than Rikers.

                  For comparison, San Francisco is 47 square miles. Amsterdam is 64 square miles. You’d literally need detention camps that total the size of San Francisco or Amsterdam to intern one million Uyghurs. It’d be like looking at a map of California. There’s Los Angeles. There’s San Diego. And look, there’s San Francisco Concentration City with its one million Uyghurs.

                  Literally visible to the naked eye from space.

                  The fact that you actually believed this bit of propaganda shows just how incredibly credulous you are. 😂

                  • ExFed
                    1·
                    1 year ago

                    Literally visible to the naked eye from space.

                    Yes. They are.

                    Welcome to the wide world of OSINT 🙃

                    So what’s the score? I haven’t been keeping track. Is the home team winning?