I used slackware decades ago. Didn’t know it was still around. Why would I use slackware over something like arch?

  • lolzacksnyderfans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It always will be so long as Pat maintains it, I stopped using it years ago though. It lost its way trying to compete with Desktop OSes, and pretty much Arch replaced that niche, now we have Artix, Void and Alpine.

    • Hatch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do like the approach of 64 bit packages only. Serperating my other programs to conty for say my gamings, to keep my system clean. I did not try creating a vm, as there is a documentation to create kvm/ qemu virt manager , so that will be something i look forward to try so i can just gpu passthrough with slackware as the host.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This, with the prevalence of containers, slackware has the edge as a stable host system. Even slackware + nixpkg is pretty interesting.

        • mkonji@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s how I’ve been managing the last little bit after going back to Slackware. Good stable combination.