What an enjoyable cozy scifi adventure! The story centers around a security bot with a self-hacked governor module, who refers to itself privately as “Murderbot” and likes to watch serials and movies surreptitiously in it’s free time. The socially awkward bot repeatedly assures us that it definitely does not care about humans. When the team of scientists which have hired Murderbot are confronted by life threatening situations, it goes out of it’s way to save their lives if only just so it is not labelled as an incompetent. Over the course of the story we observe how it’s relationship with the humans in the group develops and changes. Murderbot’s at times hilarious internal monologues concerning “her humans” were my favourite parts of the book. So those of you who have read the book, how did you like it? How are the rest of the books in the series?

  • Alien Surfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive read the first few so far. The next book on my list looks to be a full length novel.

    I find your reference of “her humans” is interesting. I never thought of muderbot as a her. Perhaps I missed an important line somewhere in the story?

    I think your review is right on. You captured exactly what it’s like. I look forward to reading the next book.

    • klemptor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Martha Wells really tried to make SecUnit genderless, but because the books are written in the first person by a female author, SecUnit ends up sounding pretty female to me.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is it. Murderbot seems to talk about itself in actively gender neutral terms (it doesn’t even have genitals!), and “it” is the most used pronoun, but like you said, it’s a female author writing for a non-gendered character - not surprising it sometimes seems female.

    • clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never thought of Murderbot as a her, either. Possibly this is because I listened to All Systems Red as an audiobook, and the narrator was male, but even without that, it just seems a little more masculine to me. (It? Seems weird to call it an it. Maybe a they instead)

      Not that it matters, of course. I just find people’s projections fascinating, is all!

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Murderbot does have a conversation in one of the later books, and states that it prefers to be referred to as “sec-unit” as a name, dropping “the” from before the word.

        The rest of the characters typically refers to sec-unit, as sec-unit, from that point on.

    • chewiedies
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought of muderbot as a “her” as well. I think at some point it’s described as having a female appearance without its armor on.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s never explicitly stated what Murderbot’s gender presentation is. I do visualize it as feminine presenting personally, but I just finished a reread and it is never stated anywhere. A character calls it “third mom” at one point but it’s unclear if this is because it looks feminine or because it was smothering her as her extant mothers do.

        • Bebo@literature.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Coming to think of it, I am not absolutely sure that “her” is specifically mentioned. I probably thought of Murderbot as “her” in my head. But what I found funny was the slight possessive sense with which they/it referred to their “humans”.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I never noticed that I also thought of “her”. I read the book a while ago, so I don’t remember your reference, but I remember finding it refreshing to find a robot that was “obviously female” instead of undefined therefore male.