Archived page

It’s not worth the danger of the chase for a traffic violation, and not worth the danger of the chase for the drugs.

  • Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where do you get high speed chase? Nothing in the article states the speed.

    A chase just means they didn’t stop when the lights and sirens came on.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The title of the article is “Georgia cops proudly show off ecstasy pills, after high-speed freeway chase over traffic violation, and crash caused by PIT-maneuver”

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read the article. They don’t describe that at all.

        • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The original headline at the news site is “Driver caught with $400K in Ecstasy pills, cash after high-speed I-20 chase.”

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Read the article. That isn’t what they describe at all.

            Cops start a pursuit when the suspect fails to yield. Once they lose visual they stop the pursuit. They don’t say what speed or how long but they stoped perusing

            A short time later they see the suspect and pit the car.

            The article is poorly written but this doesn’t appear to be bad policing. They knocked off the pursuit when it wasn’t safe and immediately stopped him when they don’t the suspect later.

            I love to bash shitty cops but this is how I want them to behave unless I see evidence otherwise.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So since the title has the words high speed chase, but they don’t repeat it in the text of the article, the headline can be ignored?

              Go back to school and learn to read.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nice ad hominem.

                The article doesn’t describe that headline at all. It describes the opposite of the headline.

            • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, “high speed” isn’t mentioned in the article. It’s in the headline, though, and if we’re believing the TV station’s coverage enough to have a conversation about it, the headline is part of the coverage.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Headlines are to hype the article.

                When you read the article the exact opposite is described.

                As I said it’s a poorly written article but based on the actual article. I do not see an issue.

                I only found one other cite and it was similar.

                I have a huge issue with idiotic chases but this doesn’t appear to be one.