Welcome
Hello everyone,
I can tell there is a lot of interest in a tool to enhance the mod abilities of Lemmy.
I’ve been researching ways to do it. I have six options that I’m considering.
I’m trying to keep the topics high-level and avoid implementation discussions.
These are undeveloped high-level thoughts. I still have a lot of research into the Lemmy code base and ActivityPub.
It’s late for me, so these notes are from a stream of thought. There may be changes as I think more about this or get community feedback.
Option 1 - SaaS
Summary
A service I host. Probably maintained by donations. I might have an additional tier for enhanced moderation tools.
Pros:
- Simple setup/registration.
- No additional hosting cost for Lemmy admins.
- Ability to use community-shared moderation.
- Community data analysis to find bad actors across the federation.
- Quicker to develop. No need to worry about tech support, setup, configuration wizards, etc.
- Could be set up with any ActivityPub instance. (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.).
- If successful, it could be my full-time gig.
- I would be more engaged
Cons:
- I have to store personally identifiable information & manage other compliance regulations.
- Feature releases are limited to a single pipeline.
- You don’t get your data.
- No direct DB access to do advanced queries and changes.
- Limited by ActivityPub capabilities.
Option 2 - Self-hosted
Summary
Admins would have to install, set up, and maintain the software.
Pros:
- No cost for me to run anything.
- Admins store their data.
- Direct access to databases to do advanced querying.
- Open source community project requiring/allowing outside development
Cons:
- Additional network traffic if shared moderation is used.
- Link flooding and spam tracking across instances aren’t as likely to exist.
- Would mostly be purpose-built for Lemmy. No additional federation support.
- I would be less engaged and rely on community support
Option 3 - SaaS that requires a self-hosted service
Summary
This is sort of a mix of the above. The interface and interaction are central; however, an agent must be installed to interface with the Lemmy instance.
Pros:
- Best of both worlds.
- A custom API could be built to work with the adapter service. Not limited by ActivityPub.
Cons:
- Worst of both worlds.
- Purpose-built for Lemmy to start. (Adapters for other systems could be built).
- More complex to build.
- Additional server cost and maintenance. More complicated setup for admins.
Option 4 - SaaS & Self-Hosted
Summary
You could use the SaaS solution or install it locally.
Pros:
- I could charge for SaaS to finance the project.
- All the pros of SaaS and Self-hosted
- The people have choice
Cons:
- More complex to build
- All the cons of SaaS and Self-hosted
Option 5 - Ask the devs to do it
Summary
We tell the devs of Lemmy to include better tools and how we want them.
Pros:
- Less work for me/us
- Moderation built into Lemmy and not a separate app
Cons:
- We have to wait for them to do it all
- They might say no
Option 6 - Contribute to the dev repo
Summary
Build enhancements to the core of Lemmy’s moderation tools.
Pros:
- Community support to add features
- Users only have to update to get new features, no configuration
- No additional server costs
Cons:
- Only works on Lemmy
- Lemmy becomes a Monolithic application - scaling challenges
- Pro: A flag could be added to only enable moderation-specific scheduled tasks on a single instance.
Could you fork the source start adding your features and then merge later?
Yes, that would be the plan if it’s contributed to the core.