• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, I’m shocked Xitter had numbers as high as 14% when it comes to dealing with hate speech…

    • FailBait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once reported an obvious anti-Semitic post that I found (was curious if they actually would). Took them a week or two but they actually took it down. I was shocked.

      • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        One engagement dies down around a post they can take it down and just pretend they’re oh so backlogged to save face.

        Everyone saw it already, the damage was done.

        • TechyDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of course, they might actually be backlogged because Musk fired almost everyone who dealt with that stuff. When you hamstring a department, they can quickly fall behind on their work.

  • snipgan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitter, as far as I have recalled, has almost always been a cesspool for hot takes and hate. Just with Elon in charge the flood gates have really opened and has acquired a particular flavor mimicking his own tastes.

    The real question now is if this will ultimately lead to the ban or slow death of Twitter. People really can only put up with so much vitriol.

    Many countries are lining up with laws and bill coming after social media, usually under the goal or “goal” of protecting kids, so we will see how things turn out. Might even be a quicker death/change then.

  • Maya_Weiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey, they did managed to react on my hate speech posts… against v.putin. Rather quickly too. So yeah, if you are a dictator, its all Gucci.

  • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We don’t want to be the ones policing forums.”

    At the same time

    Elon aids the enemy in the Ukraine and Russia conflict.

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Check their post history. Next most recent comment is calling Lyft sexist for letting women select the gender of their driver, and the one after that is saying that there should be no limits on landlord’s ability to evict.

        This is not someone operating in good faith.

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except when elon doesn’t like what you write. Then the free speech isn’t that free any more

  • spacecadet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is true both before and after it was owned by musk, it just went from left wing hate speech to right wing hate speech

      • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Fascists should k*ll themselves” got me banned from xitter so that’s the kinda ‘hate speech’ they care about

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Those billionaires have too much money and people should be able to afford a one bedroom apartment on a full time minimum wage job!

        /Hatespeech

      • spacecadet
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        68
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Calling for the genocide of whites, men, straight people, certain political ideologies, praising the appropriation of Western European culture to “subvert” it and rewrite it, banning books, etc…

        Edit: oh shit, thought Reddit was the delusional echo chamber, maybe it’s Lemmy, too.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          53
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who is calling for such things?

          And as for banning books, are you sure it’s the left that’s doing that? Because I can share some links with you…

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2014/03/a-twitter-hashtag-probably-doesnt-prove-feminists-want-to-kill-all-men/359493/

            Almost every extreme view will likely have someone pushing those ideals through xitter at some point. Whether or not those posts gain any sort of traction or represent a greater movement could still be up for debate.

            Quick note: this isn’t meant to support or oppose any side or position. Just putting information out there addressing the question that was posed.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I can’t read past the paywall, but it looks like that hashtag was meant to be sarcastic. Denying the Holocaust, praising Hitler, saying racist things… those are not done with sarcasm.

              • meco03211@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                1 year ago

                Would you accept other hate speech provided it’s qualified as “sarcastic”? How should xitter determine sarcastic messages vs serious ones?

                And saying the entirety of that hashtag was used sarcastically is incredibly presumptuous. How would someone prove to you that it was used at least once seriously?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I would say that entirely depends on how it’s worded. This was a parody of another hashtag that was being used sarcastically. I would not call that hate speech in any way. I’m sorry, but “killallmen” is clearly not meant the way the hate speech being allowed on Twitter is meant now. There’s a world of difference. It’s not even comparable.

        • Telorand@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, a whole list of “things that never happened.”

          Please, get help to escape the conspiracy feedback loop you’re obviously in.

          • don
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            come back to reality please.

            I admire your optimism.

        • muse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would you like to show us on doll where your imaginary evil strawman touched you?

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Nowhere. I was nowhere near it, and it made false allegations that I sexually assaulted it. Now my life is ruined over lies and cancel culture. —that guy, probably