Alternatively, if your current phone doesn’t have a headphone jack, do you wish it did?

  • OrangeJoe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sympathy? What a dumb take.

    People still have wired headphones that still work perfectly fine. We used to be able to use them directly with our phones. We also had the option of using wireless too if we wanted. The option was removed, so now in order to keep using some of still perfectly fine electronics with our phones, it requires adapters. That’s annoying. What is the benefit to me as a consumer now that the jack is gone? Some marketing bullshit about weight or cost savings? I don’t buy it. Phones are larger than ever and more expensive than ever.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s half an argument to be made about waterproofing, but it kinda falls flat when the waterproofing we get isn’t that good.

      “This phone is IP68 rated!”

      Oh cool, so I can go swimming with it and take it into the shower?

      “Haha, no.”

      Great, so glad we gave up a ton of features for this.

      • HeckGazer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t let yourself be gaslit by anti right to repair and apple propaganda. We had a smartphone with removable battery and headphone jack that you could swim with, it has been done. The water resistance argument does not hold water, at all.

      • June
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That and headphone jacks were able to be made waterproof pretty easily too. It does introduce a new area for potential incursion, but it’s pretty minimal for the vast majority of users.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is a cheap adaptor for your legacy headphones any more annoying than literally being tethered by a cable attached to your head connected to an object in your pocket? You ask what the benefit is as a consumer. Simple: not having a cable wired around your body. You’re championing an out dated, superfluous connector just ‘cause you’re used to its objective inconvenience.

      • OrangeJoe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a consumer, I could already use wireless headphones when phones still had headphones jacks. As a consumer I had the choice if I wanted to be inconvenienced by a cable, or inconvenienced by having yet another thing to charge that is easy to lose.

        And you have the absolute wrong take here. Nobody in this argument has ever said we only want the ability to use wired. We absolutely understand the convenience of wireless headphones. But by removing the jack, the option to choose was removed.

        You are championing essentially making perfectly good headphones obsolete or requiring extra adapters in favor of something that we already had the option to use before anyways.

        This has never been a situation where only one could exist at a time.