and even though I’m tired, things are all right!

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s the problem with pressure+heat? In these kinds or pressures and temperatures, the plastic appears to be strong enough to handle it well enough.

    • ceeg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s strong enough to, but i don’t trust plastic not to leach out nasties into my coffee in those conditions, plus it seems to retain grossness :(

      • eramseth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For what its worth, I think aeropress uses plastic that’s less bad, if that’s possible (I believe this consideration went into the design).

        Still, I’m with you on this. It’s really hard to get away from plastic though. Even in relatively high end drip machines, the internals of most espresso makers, etc.

        • ceeg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          i super agree, french press or moka is my target, i just miss the flavor the pressure creates. i’ll figure it out one day!

          i think the tritan plastic they’re using in the new models will be interesting, def seems less porous and likely to hang onto bad flavors x_x

          • eramseth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah… you can always just… clean it… unflavored denture / retainer/ mouth guard cleaning tablets or … actual coffee cleaning solution (also available in tablet form) should remove most or all of funk…

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Seems to me that the results are inconclusive at the moment, which only means that the potential effect can’t be noticed as easily as the effects of asbestos, DDT, smoking or radiation. That doesn’t mean that the effect isn’t there. It may well exist, but it certainly isn’t very strong, because otherwise we would have noticed it already and the debate would have been over decades ago. But since we can’t rule it out at this point, I really don’t blame anyone from being a bit cautious.

            As a side note, you would get lots of clicks for your article if you were say that “we’re all going to die because of plastic”, but it wouldn’t be a very defendable position. Fortunately for the author, there is a way to make the reader think that without explicitly saying anything like it. By using clever words like “likely”, “associated”, “possibly”, “may be”, “in vitro”, “could disrupt”, “linked to”, “animal studies” etc. you can sort of say things without actually saying anything. You can also make the reader feel informed without actually conveying much information at all.

            • ceeg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree about the soft language they use and plastics are a BROAD category of materials… but yeah, I like to be cautious around exposing them to heat and using them for long term liquid storage.