• GBU_28
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The point is I selected an example that had no relation to cars or driving, and no safety context.

    The point of the example was ownership, and dealings with the government.

    Critical thinking 101

    I made clear in earlier comments that I’m aware driving is a privilege and reckless driving is a serious crime

    • rus@layer8.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @GBU_28 the point is significance of the criminal action and the penalty.

      Paying my property taxes late should have a fine (a penalty), but assuming I pay them with in a reasonable time, one that is not significant (say 2% of the taxes amount, or a flat fee of $25)

      The government is taking things of value without recompense because I failed to act with in the law.

      I’ve seen no argument from you that the penalty is not reasonable, or that a reasonable penalty is unjust.

      • rus@layer8.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @GBU_28 additionally, there are many cases where the government seizes the tools used to commit the crime.

        I (off the top of my head) only find issue with this where the confiscated “stuff” is not evidence and taken prior to conviction.