• lud
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s what I said.

      • lud
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, but it doesn’t matter. I just provided the exact measurements because I was copy pasting anyways.

        • cartoon meme dog
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          When the original value is only precise to plus or minus half an inch, it makes no sense whatsoever to do a conversion that’s a hundred times more precise.

          • lud
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s more precise and took no extra effort. 🤷

            Why is it bothering you so much?

            • cartoon meme dog
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It’s not more precise, it becomes inaccurate.

              A man says he’s 6’6". Sure. If he’s anywhere between 6’5½" and 6’6½", that’s true.

              You say he’s 198.12cm tall. The range of this being true is now thinner than a needle. It has gone far beyond what anyone actually measures. In over 99% of cases, it’s not true, and if it is, it won’t be for long, because the human body isn’t nearly that consistent from breath to breath.

              The conversion with spurious false precision has made the number go from true to not true.

              The man is six foot six, yes, true. The man is 198.12cm - no he isn’t.

      • lud
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you actually contributed by providing the information to begin with I would agree.