• ours@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Plus us patient gamers can enjoy those PS “exclusives” when they release on PC.

    • Vespair
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah exactly. Crazy thing is a good game is just as good 3, 4 years later as it is on release day. What a novel idea, right?

      • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There was a time where the fact that launch meant a high player count, big community energy, and lack of hyper-optimized strategies minmaxxing the fun out of a game was sufficient reason to get it at launch.

        But given how often modern launches are bungled, even that is not always true

        • Vespair
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah I should have clarified that for multiplayer games, especially lobby-style instead of persistent-world style, all of this changes because how active and engaged the playerbase is a HUGE component.

          But I’m a solo player 90% of the time, so that particular aspect, while important, doesn’t really pertain to me.

          • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Even big singleplayer games can be fun. I liked being involved in the early days of BG3’s release, for example. But then again, no mans sky and cyberpunk sucked