• dQw4w9WgXcQ
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s a very rough approximation which was used in anti-smoking campaigns, at least in the 90s/00s.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A lot of that was exaggerated. 7 minutes per puff really doesn’t sound realistic. But since it convinced people to stop smoking I guess everyone agreed that some misinformation was OK?

      • dQw4w9WgXcQ
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I really don’t have a clue, but calculating averages might yield results which don’t represent a directly applicable value. If some people lose tens of years due to dramatic complications, it could weigh up a lot for people who barely lose any life length.

        Again, I’m just guessing wildly, but anything which scares people away from smoking is good in my opinion.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Again, I’m just guessing wildly, but anything which scares people away from smoking is good in my opinion.

          That’s where I disagree, spreading misinformation as scientific fact causes people to lose trust in health authorities, and it fuels things like the anti-vax movement and flat earthers. The ends don’t justify the means.