• Sen. JD Vance recounted being asked if he had a “secret family” during the vice presidential vetting process, which he found intrusive and bizarre, especially since his wife was present.
  • Vance described the vetting process as detailed and intrusive, including questions about potential family criticisms and criminal history.
  • Politicians undergoing vice presidential vetting often face extensive scrutiny to prepare for media examination, highlighting past examples like Herschel Walker and John Edwards who had hidden children.
    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      I said above that would I hope for their sake that it was both and here is why… if you ask him in private, he might say yes or no whether or not that’s true. If you ask him in front of his wife, you can gauge her reaction to his answer. If he says no and they notice she reacts to that in even a way that shows she is doubting his answer, they should notice. Whether there was something to notice and they noticed it, I don’t know.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      From the article:

      “Oh, by the way, if I did, I’m not going to admit it in front of my wife,” Vance said, laughing.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Regardless, I wouldn’t consider an answer to that as dependable with his wife present. Similarly if a doctor is asking about sexual activity, I wouldn’t expect them to ask in front of their SO.

      If you want an honest answer, make sure it’s in confidence.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That kinda bugs me. When I had to take my wife to the hospital, they asked her if she felt safe at home, and if someone was abusing her, while I was in the room. I offered to leave the room for a few minutes so she could answer clearly and they were like “no, that isn’t necessary.”

        It really should be standard procedure. I’ve never laid a hand on her, but it should be standard to protect the people whom have been abused by their partners.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or have a good body-language interpreter behind the glass. Though with his response, may not even need to look to the wife to see how nervous she was about it