One thing Reddit dominates on is search results. I’m looking things up and seeing so many links to reddit, which I guess is going to help keep that place relevant (unless those subreddits stay dark).

I wondered how Lemmy and this fed thingy stuff all works for that? With more posts can we expect to see people arriving through search results?

  • wpuckering@lm.williampuckering.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, if you’re running something yourself, you can do pretty much whatever you want in order to protect it. Especially if it’s behind a reverse proxy. Firewalls are great for protecting ports, but reverse proxies can be their own form of protection, and I don’t think a lot of people associate them with “protection” so much. Why expose paths (unauthenticated) that don’t need to be? For instance, in my case with my Lemmy instance, all any other instance needs is access to the /api path which I leave open. And all the other paths are behind basic authentication which I can access, so I can still use the Lemmy web interface on my own instance if I want to. But if I don’t want others browsing to my instance to see what communities have been added, or I don’t want to give someone an easy glance into what comments or posts my profile has made across all instances (for a little more privacy), then I can simply hide that behind the curtain without losing any functionality.

    It’s easy to think of these things when you have relevant experience with web development, debugging web applications, full stack development, and subject matter knowledge in related areas, if you have a tendency to approach things with a security-oriented mindset. I’m not trying to sound arrogant, but honestly my professional experience has a lot to do with how my personal habits have formed around my hobbies. So I have a tendency to take things as far as I can with everything that I know, and stuff like this is the result lol. Might be totally unnecessary without much actual value, but it errs on the side of “a little more secure”, and why not, if it’s fun?

    • Arinshot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be interested in how you did this, this seems like one of the best ways I’ve seen for securing a lemmy instance.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One easy way to do that is to set up something like Nginx as a reverse proxy in front and forward /api clean, but forward everything else with basic auth.

        The steps broadly would be:

        And you’re done.

      • wpuckering@lm.williampuckering.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a single Nginx container that handles reverse proxying of all my selfhosted services, and I break every service out into its own configuration file, and use include directives to share common configuration across them. For anyone out there with Nginx experience, my Lemmy configuration file should make it fairly clear in terms of how I handle what I described above:

        server {
          include ssl_common.conf;
          server_name lm.williampuckering.com;
          set $backend_client lemmy-ui:1234;
          set $backend_server lemmy-server:8536;
          
          location / {
            set $authentication "Authentication Required";
            include /etc/nginx/proxy_nocache_backend.conf;
            
            if ($http_accept = "application/activity+json") {
              set $authentication off;
              set $backend_client $backend_server;
            }
            if ($http_accept = "application/ld+json; profile=\"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams\"") {
              set $authentication off;
              set $backend_client $backend_server;
            }
            if ($request_method = POST) {
              set $authentication off;
              set $backend_client $backend_server;
            }
            
            auth_basic $authentication;
            auth_basic_user_file htpasswd;
            proxy_pass http://$backend_client;
          }
          
          location ~* ^/(api|feeds|nodeinfo|.well-known) {
            include /etc/nginx/proxy_nocache_backend.conf;
            proxy_pass http://$backend_server;
          }
          
          location ~* ^/pictrs {
            proxy_cache lemmy_cache;
            include /etc/nginx/proxy_cache_backend.conf;
            proxy_pass http://$backend_server;
          }
          
          location ~* ^/static {
            proxy_cache lemmy_cache;
            include /etc/nginx/proxy_cache_backend.conf;
            proxy_pass http://$backend_client;
          }
          
          location ~* ^/css {
            proxy_cache lemmy_cache;
            include /etc/nginx/proxy_cache_backend.conf;
            proxy_pass http://$backend_client;
          }
        }
        

        It’s definitely in need of some clean-up (for instance, there’s no need for multiple location blocks that do the same thing for caching, a single expression can handle all of the ones with identical configuration to reduce the number of lines required), but I’ve been a bit lazy to clean things up. However it should serve as a good example and communicate the general idea of what I’m doing.