• Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    America: I’m sponsored by soulless corporate conglomerates.

    Italy: I’m sponsored by cheese!

    America: tears up and salutes Italy

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, those cheeses are also big global conglomerates and they take it a step further by gatekeeping the name of their cheeses.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why is this worse than standard conglomerate practices? It’s effectively a brand name, no?

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Less a brand name because multiple companies can make parmigiano reggiano, but it’s a combination of requirements designed to protect local industry - for example, for it to be parmigiano reggiano cheese it has to be made with one of two lists of three ingredients, the milk has to come from cows from a specific region of Italy, a certain percentage of the feed for those cows must come from a specific region of Italy, is aged for a certain minimum time, etc, etc. It’s an entire set of industries protected by a legal definition of a cheese.

          When you see “parmesan” instead of “parmigiano reggiano” it’s a similar sort of cheese that isn’t made within the legally protected definition. Most often it’s just not made in the one specific part of Italy with milk from cows from that part of Italy fed by feed from that part of Italy, it’s made somewhere else using dairy that doesn’t have to be imported. Or it’s aged “enough” for the flavors to develop but not the full time required. Or both.

          There are a whole array of product designations in the EU that basically exist to protect individual agricultural industries from competition by requiring that products be made in a certain place, or using products from a certain place in order to prevent outsiders from duplicating the product, increasing supply and driving down prices.

          Basically the same logic as “if it’s not from the Champagne wine region in France it’s just sparkling white wine.” Also the same reason why “real” balsamic vinegar costs a fucking fortune.

            • SpongyAneurism@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not really. It doesn’t really prevent competition. You’re welcome to make your own cheese (or whatever) that competes with the protected variant. You’re just not allowed to call it the same thing.

              It’s more like a measure to prevent shitty corporate cost cutting and skimpflation strategies from ruining a thing into oblivion and ensuring that you can rely on a certain level of quality that is associated with the traditional product.

              The system might have it’s downsides, but I’m definitely on board with the intent.