• Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is a lot harder to get a large percent of your voting base behind a single person when it is the de facto party for anyone left of autocratic, right wing, authoritarianism. Meanwhile a republican can just belligerently spout bigotry, play a “strong man” leader, and pay lip service to theocrats, and a small handful of single issues, and activate a base who will vote for them like it is a religious decree.

    It is that simple. Roughly 1/3 of the population want fascism, or something is the same wheelhouse. A little more do not necessarily want that, but are unconcerned with it happening as long as they get to own a gun, or whatever their single issue may be. Everyone who thinks this is bad is stuck with the democrats, and most people are to physically comfortable to truly risk anything for the large systemic changes needed to fix this. At least not the will to sustain it for the multiple generations it will take to see the fruits of that labor.

    • greenskye
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean exactly? Why are Democrats courting the people flirting with fascists instead of at least the broad, varied base of their own group. The could cater to the conservative Democrats and still come out ahead.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because it has a history of not working as well as holding the larger, more cohesive, status quo and target a much smaller group of people to sway.