Even the teamsters are showing up.

  • jimbolauski
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Here is a partial list of racists democrats that voted against the civil rights act of 1964 ( there were alot of dems that voted no and I got lazy)and when they stopped being reps/senators.  If the parties switched these guys wouldn’t be representing the racists democrats up to 2010.

    George William Andrews 1972 Robert Emmett Jones 1972 Armistead Selden 1968 Wilbur Mills 1976 James Trimble 1966 Robert Sikes 1978 Charles Edward Bennett 1992 Dante Fascell 1992 Paul Rogers 1978 Don Fuqua 1986 Sam Gibbons 1996 George Hagan 1972 Phillip Landrum 1976 Robert Stephens 1976 William Natcher 1994 Joseph Waggonner 1978 Otto Passman 1976 Gillis Long 1986 Jamie Whitten 1994 Lawrence Fountain 1982 David Newton Henderson 1976 Roy Taylor 1976 Joseph Evins 1976 John Patman 1976 Herbert Roberts 1980 Olin Teague 1978 William Poage 1978 James Claude Wright 1989 Robert Byrd 2010 James Eastland 1978 Sam Ervin 1974 Russell B. Long 1987 John L. McClellan 1977 John Jackson Sparkman 1979 John C. Stennis 1989 Herman Talmadge 1981

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m glad you’re curious, you can do an internet search and find articles. You are curious, right? I mean certainly you are not asking so that you can claim it is invalid unless there is an exact year, month, and day that everyone swapped over. That would be disingenuous and bad faith argumentation. Surely you are above that.

          • jimbolauski
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            All I’m looking for is a time frame when the parties “switched”, it’s telling that you can’t provide one. Even a definitive time when the parties finished switching would be sufficient but again you seem unable to provide one.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              If you want a timeline please feel free to read a more in depth article about it.

              • jimbolauski
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                No article provides that timeline, it’s clear you can’t provide it either.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Every resource about it gives times and lists specific examples like Goldwater. It’s clear you did not check and are not interested in good faith discussion. (As was obvious from the start.)

                  • jimbolauski
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    You should check your history better, Goldwater only opposed the 1964 civil rights act, he supported 1957, 1960, & 24th admendment. His switching had more to do with his opposition to new deal policies.

                    It was a good try, at least you attempted to provide evidence for your claim. The problem with this argument is for every dem senator or rep that changed parties there are 20 that stayed.

    • NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      The parties never switched. That’s just a weird Democrat lie. Democrats use to have slaves and now they use welfare and dividing people into groups as their form of bondage

      I’ve never seen a group so focused into turning a portion of who they are into defining themselves. It’s weird as hell