• sprack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Nuclear power is great. How soon can you have it installed and add capacity?

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Going by history, in 20 to 60 years.

      Thankfully, the nuclear pushers have mostly shut-up nowadays. Because the thing can’t compete with renewables and probably can’t be built before we almost run out of fossil fuels. It’s a very expensive distraction.

      (Oh also, it can’t feed a grid without batteries or some dispatchable backup.)

      But well, if somebody wants to invest their money in it, I’d say go for it!

    • x0x7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Very soon. If we change the absolute clown decision under the Carter administration to not reuse nuclear waste we can just use the nuclear waste we’ve already built up, never burn another hydrocarbon, and never install a single additional solar panel (cause why not), and power the US for 150 years with relatively little mining.

      Energy is solved. But neither party wants it to be solved. They want a problem they can have political gainsmanship over. Whether it is the Rs wanting wars to support a petro-dollar as an excuse to give their friends in the defense world money, or the Ds wanting tax funded projects for their donors. An actual solution offers no party any advantage over the current problem.