When someone has no money and gets dangerous job and dies there, will you say that the reason that person got such job is to die too? Or when person goes to shop and gets ran over by a car, will you say that the person went outside to be ran over by a car? Results don’t have to match reasons.
Also bigotry? Really? What statement did I say that was proven to be false?
Even more, stating that results and reasons are always the same will lead to victimblaming.
To me your original point reads as “Trans people could have a normal reason for transitioning, but the result can be that they’re perverted” which like… what?
To me your original point reads as “Trans people could have a normal reason for transitioning, but the result can be that they’re perverted” which like… what?
This is not my point. I’ll replace trans in comments of this thread to better show flaw in logic.
“Only creepy if done by a foreigner but then again, no citizen would do thing like this”, “Except those that live in city”, “number of people who live in city for perverted reasons is basically zero”.
Last statement may be(and probably is) true, but it does not strictly oppose statement before it.
When someone has no money and gets dangerous job and dies there, will you say that the reason that person got such job is to die too? Or when person goes to shop and gets ran over by a car, will you say that the person went outside to be ran over by a car? Results don’t have to match reasons.
Also bigotry? Really? What statement did I say that was proven to be false?
Even more, stating that results and reasons are always the same will lead to victimblaming.
What point are you even trying to make?
To me your original point reads as “Trans people could have a normal reason for transitioning, but the result can be that they’re perverted” which like… what?
This is not my point. I’ll replace trans in comments of this thread to better show flaw in logic.
“Only creepy if done by a foreigner but then again, no citizen would do thing like this”, “Except those that live in city”, “number of people who live in city for perverted reasons is basically zero”.
Last statement may be(and probably is) true, but it does not strictly oppose statement before it.