My original question was “How do we disincentivize the purchase of pickup trucks/SUVs” but then I thought it would be better to approach the larger problem of car dependency and car ownership. One option is, of course, to create public transit infrastructure and improve it where it already exist. This, however, doesn’t change the fact that some will still choose to drive. What would be the best ways to discourage people from owning personal cars?

  • hex123456@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    14 days ago

    Public transportation should be provided for the public by the public. Quit wasting time with ticket booths and all that shit. Just free transportation. We aren’t charged per use for roads so people drive. Make public transport free so transportation is equally accessible by all social classes.

    Even with cheap fares now, moving a family is still more expensive by bus than vehicle. I don’t drive for my sake. I drive for the others that need me to drive for them.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Long ago my city made all public transit free on spare the air days. (Days where particulate concentrations were predicted to be high) I do miss those, they were actually kinda fun. I would like them to come back someday.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        This is so backwards. They wait til the the air is already fucked up to provide the cleaner alternative. Wouldn’t it be better to always provide that then have less bad air days because less people are driving and spewing particulates?

        • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          It takes a really, really prolonged inversion later to trigger a spare the air day from just smog. That alone is fairly rare. Bigger culprates are BBQ’s and fireplaces. By far, the #1 trigger is wildfires. That was the first spare the air month I’ve experienced!

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not to say that you’re wrong, but driving does cost money in the form of registration, excise tax, gas taxes, and inspection. It’s still heavily subsidized, but drivers don’t pay nothing to use the roads

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        Many of those are fixed costs. That means that if you use the car more, it becomes more worth it.

        Instead of making cars more expensive, we should make public transport cheaper. And it should also reach outside of cities.

        If you want to go outside of a city for whatever reason (maybe you even live outside a city!) the options for public transport are very few, very expensive, and very time consuming.

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          The one tied to increased use is linked, not fixed.

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well there are fees in registration, and gas, but it isn’t enough.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        If we want people to switch, time and money are the best motivators to broadly apply. Making transit both faster and cheaper than a car (or free) will increase ridership and decrease car usage.

        • ECB@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          I remember a study from Denmark that pointed towards convenience dwarfing every other reason (including cost) for choice of transport.

          Basically people took bikes rather than cars because it was quicker and easier to take the bike. In places where cars where more convenient, people would drive, even if it was outrageously expensive.

          Very few people were driven by health/environmental benefits, cost, fun, etc

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          No disagreement. Was just clarifying misinformation.