• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s both. Sort of an election dependent Schrödinger’s cat. The settlement amount was far too low in relation to the damage caused and the profits earned, so the immunity from future settlements was absurd. However, if Trump wins in the fall, there’s no way his new Project 2025 Schedule F hires will bring appropriate charges against a business doing business.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re not wrong. At the same time, if Trump wins, the idea that the Sacklers might get away with effectively homicide on a multi billion dollar heroin dealing scale, won’t be even in the top 100 problems. “How can we punish the guilty” will have to take a back seat to “how can I prevent the guilty from directly threatening my safety or maybe putting me in prison” for a little while.