• sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wood is definitely better than nothing, but I don’t really see a situation in which this thing would need protection against small arms anyway. Unless something has already gone horribly wrong, those small arms are a significant distance from your artillery. At that range, they are already effectively worthless because their lack of rifling makes them horribly inaccurate.

    If I had to guess, you would mainly be worried about union sharpshooters (maybe) and artillery. At that point the only real advantage of the wood is the obstruction of sight.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The standard rifled muskets of the time actually had a range of about a kilometer.