lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-23 months agoIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up1378arrow-down163file-text
arrow-up1315arrow-down1imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orglambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square187fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·3 months agoSQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p. I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type ≠.
minus-squarelemming@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoIf you want to be able to write practically anything on mobile, including ≠, ≈, ‰, ℝ etc., have a look at Unexpected keyboard. No spellcheck or autocomplete, though.
minus-squareludlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months ago I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type. I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoYup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoSQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.
SQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p.
I was on mobile so I didn’t have a
.XCompose
available to type≠
.If you want to be able to write practically anything on mobile, including ≠, ≈, ‰, ℝ etc., have a look at Unexpected keyboard. No spellcheck or autocomplete, though.
I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
Yup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
SQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.