Adobe’s employees are typically of the same opinion of the company as its users, having internally already expressed concern that AI could kill the jobs of their customers. That continued this week in internal discussions, where exasperated employees implored leadership to not let it be the “evil” company customers think it is.

This past week, Adobe became the subject of a public relations firestorm after it pushed an update to its terms of service that many users saw at best as overly aggressive and at worst as a rights grab. Adobe quickly clarified it isn’t spying on users and even promised to go back and adjust its terms of service in response.

For many though, this was not enough, and online discourse surrounding Adobe continues to be mostly negative. According to internal Slack discussions seen by Business Insider, as before, Adobe’s employees seem to be siding with users and are actively complaining about Adobe’s poor communications and inability to learn from past mistakes.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s what it is with a union too, it’s just more organized. You can strike without a union, it’s just a lot harder to organize and the stakes are way higher.

    • catloaf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      And with a union, you have legal protection. Individually, you don’t.

        • catloaf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve never heard of private unions, so I googled. Sounds like it’s just a union at a private company? That’s probably the vast majority of unions. And yes, they have protection under the NLRA.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re right! I didn’t realize individual workers and informal unions had a right to strike.

            But their protections are a lot more limited than public unions, like the teachers or police unions. If you’re striking for better pay or conditions, it seems you can be replaced and, depending on circumstances, fired without legal repercussions, whereas if it’s for unfair labor practices, you have more protections.

            But you do have a lot more legal protections than I thought, so that’s good to know.