• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So is Ukraine supposed to micromanage how each piece of equipment is being used based on how each donor country feels about attacking Russia?

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes. They sold the equipment under stipulations on how it will be used. If the US just gives Ukraine massive long-range offensive capabilities then Russia will treat that as a declaration of a proxy war and may attack US forces elsewhere. Or escalate in other ways. No one wants a desperate Russia. They want Russia to spend itself to death, again. And die like it did in the cold war.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thats just the excuse, Ukraine has not declared war on anyone despite Iran, North Korea and China providing weapons to Russia. Russia just likes to rattle and make noise and the wst constantly walks on egg sells.

        • intensely_human
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          We’re too nice. We work hard on making a society in which basic security negotiations aren’t necessary, but the drawback is that we forget how to do that.

          We’re too successful in keeping people safe, and now we don’t remember how to deal with monsters.

      • intensely_human
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        And die like it did in the cold war.

        Except it only appeared to die. Ukraine gave up its nukes in the 90s on the belief Russian aggression had “died” in the cold war.

        • breden@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, they gave up their nukes for the promise of Ukrainian independence and it was seen as good deal because Moscow still held sole control over all launch sequences.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, that’s what the rest of the west want, but Ukraine just want to punch Russia in the face and send them packing. They don’t have the people or morale for a full-on meat grinder war over the next decade.

        • fuckingkangaroos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          They don’t have the people or morale for a full-on meat grinder war over the next decade.

          Russia doesn’t have the people or morale. Ukrainians are defending their homes with outside support, Russians are being dragged kicking and screaming into war with blocking troops behind them so they can’t turn and run.

          Russia had a major demographic problem before any of this started, then a bunch of young men fled mobilization, now thousands are dying every week. The Kremlin’s last mobilization was deeply unpopular.

          This isn’t the combined power of the USSR driven by an ideological hope for a better future, it’s a shrinking country with an unstable economy run by the Mafia.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unfortunately, yes. I assume a substantial portion of their military budget goes towards coffee and headache medication for the logistics department

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, how is Russia to know which bit of equipment is attacking them, and where is it from?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Inventory Numbers, same reason we can identify us bombs used on civilian targets in Israel.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          So they have to hope they find details on fragments left. I literally have no idea of the odds on that.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Pretty good actually.

            You should check out bomb reconstructions from terrorist incidents and compare them to contemporary investigations done on conventional bombs.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              I know it is done when there is one bomb by some nutters, but it seams labour intensive. Not sure how well it scales to warfare.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Bombings in civilian areas are almost always investigated, is the reason Israel is refusing to let third parties in without restriction. They know if investigators get in too much will get out and they won’t be able to shake to fascist genocidal government image.

    • intensely_human
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yup. It’s like Vietnam, but instead of the VC in the bushes it’s the Russian army.

  • JVT038@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sounds good, but they first need to actually deliver the jets, because this is otherwise pointless.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      “You can use our F-16s to attack deep in the russian territory.”

      “Great! Where are the F-16s?”

      “We will give them to you.”

      “Alright. We’ll be waiting.”

      jeapordy theme plays

      “Theres no F-16s coming, are there?”

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    F-16s have so many strings attached that I’m surprised they haven’t been literally copied or pirated lol.

    They don’t like giving AMRAAMs either.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t that usually in the discretion of the country that built the fighter? E.g. the US? Usually the US has the final say on whether a fighter they sold to a country can be resold, and I find it weird that they would then allow the Netherlands to do something like that without their approval.

    • intensely_human
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, you did use the word “the” correctly so I’ll give you that