To be fair, most (or all?) of the positive remarks can be found from religious people, too. And most (or all?) of the positive remarks are not scientific, but subjective anyways. No, no one is “according to science”.
So while on surface it seems to be a comparison between systems, it’s actually a comparison between subjective remarks from people. Which of course very much depends on the specific people and not so much on the system.
I can get behind the intended idea, but found the application lacking. Or in summary, Flawed, but with potential for greatness!
To be fair, most (or all?) of the positive remarks can be found from religious people, too. And most (or all?) of the positive remarks are not scientific, but subjective anyways. No, no one is “according to science”.
So while on surface it seems to be a comparison between systems, it’s actually a comparison between subjective remarks from people. Which of course very much depends on the specific people and not so much on the system.
I can get behind the intended idea, but found the application lacking. Or in summary, Flawed, but with potential for greatness!