• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    More than anything it is a matter of principle and choice.

    Yes, the psn thing was listed somewhere deep down the steam page, where most users dont bother to look and people who are gifted the game will never ckeck. It was also disabled almost immediately, and many thousands of players bought the game and played it for months without ever being asked or informed to make a psn account. Evidently the game runs perfectly fine as is without any need or tangible advantage to enable it now, aside from obvious corporate greed. Even the security pretense they tried doesn’t track because as you point out there is a very invasive anti cheat running anyway.

    Meanwhile the anti cheat was also very unpopular, but players could make that choice themselves because it is well known, prominently displayed, and has been consistently a part of the game.

    Also, it is not hypocritical at all. One is for mostly legitimate reasons like cheat protection, the other is obvious and pure corporate greed. Not to mention that the assumption that if a person is willing to compromise their data to one party, they should he willing to give it to anyone else who asks as well, is a logical fallacy.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Even worse, it was probably so one bigwig could boast to have boosted new accounts by n%, and get a fat bonus.

    • kworpyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ok true. However I still find it ironic.