• 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pubOPEnglish
      26·
      6 months ago

      man, being accused of rape really messes up your reputation, no wonder I see so many men saying they’re uncomfortable around women…

      Can you debunk his Christianity without resorting to such cheap shots ? That would be impressive and surprising…

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        2·
        6 months ago

        Are you suggesting the four women are lying? I don’t care to “debunk” anything. It’s sufficient for me to know that he’s a sex pest and a Christian. Like peanut butter and jelly.

        • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pubOPEnglish
          12·
          6 months ago

          Are you suggesting the four women are lying?

          NO, I’m saying don’t be superficial and believe what everyone says just because they said it, these are not facts yet

          It’s sufficient for me to know that he’s a sex pest and a Christian.

          Ahh, the famous personal attack fallacy stikes again, I’ll gave you an example

          Let’s say a person named Elizabeth is a deer hunter, you see her take her rifle and go deer hunting every couple of weeks, then you say something like : she cannot possibly support gun control laws…

          And that’s a flawed reasoning, being a hunter is used as a negative characteristic to make a conclusion which could be very well untrue, Elizabeth could support many gun control laws while owning a rifle.

          Let’s go back to Russell, you’re dismissing anything he says because he’s “Christian and sex pest”… The problem here is that your conclusion came from a characterization that has nothing to do with arguments he made or the real stance he holds… Which is all there in the video

          UNLESS…

          you have some … let’s say aggressive opinions against christians, that you’re willing to dismiss anything they say, and favor anyone who oppose them instead regardless whether their claim is true or false…

          which one is it ?