Original article title: Courtier demanded assurance king could not be prosecuted under new Welsh law


A Buckingham Palace official phoned the Welsh government to secure the assurance under an archaic custom that requires UK parliaments to obtain the consent of the monarch to draft bills before they can be implemented.

According to Buckingham Palace, the royal household rang the Welsh government to ensure that “as a matter of legal correctness” the monarch could not be prosecuted under the act.

The monarchy has been given personal immunity from swathes of British law, ranging from animal welfare to workers’ rights.

More than 30 laws stipulate, for example, that police are barred from entering the privately owned Balmoral and Sandringham estates without the king’s permission to investigate possible crimes, including wildlife offences and environmental pollution. No other private landowner in the country is given such legal immunity.

A Welsh government spokesperson said: “The immunity of the monarch from prosecution is a long-established principle.” They declined to comment further.

  • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They could call his bluff, but what would a Tory be doing preventing a wealthy heir from excusing himself from an inconvenient law?

    • ramble81
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      “But I could become royalty one day and then what?”

      Is the British version of the “temporarily embarrassed millionaire”?

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not really no. In the UK our institutionalised classism is explicitly written down in law. Makes things less confusing, you see.