Across the United States, hundreds of jails have eliminated in-person family visits over the last decade. Why has this happened? The answer highlights a profound flaw in how decisions too often get made in our legal system: for-profit jail telecom companies realized that they could earn more profit from phone and video calls if jails eliminated free in-person visits for families. So the companies offered sheriffs and county jails across the country a deal: if you eliminate family visits, we’ll give you a cut of the increased profits from the larger number of calls. This led to a wave across the country, as local jails sought to supplement their budgets with hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from some of the poorest families in our society.

  • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m very curious about the first part of your statement. Do you believe in an eye for an eye, literally chopping off fingers for thieves, immediate forgiveness for repentance, or just execution?

    • stratoscaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      People are in prisons for insanely stupid reasons, why shouldn’t the people abusing them for their own gain not deserve punishment?

      Even theft is a whole different ballgame than actual indentured servitude and abuse of power.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Who cares about theft?

        Wage theft in the US totals approximately 50 billion dollars per year. That’s more than all burglaries, robberies, and car thefts, combined.

        That’s one white-collar crime. How many people behind bars stand convicted of it?

    • melpomenesclevage
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think taking away someone’s freedom then using their lack of freedom to abuse and exploit them is a special kind of sick.

      I assume that person is against killing, so that’s the most they can propose. I could also suggest depatterning or psychadelic whatever-the-reverse-of-therapy-is, but that’s a little baroque.