• shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    it is not a matter of intelligence to want to understand an info graphic without need to put work in it

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        it’s probably foolish to get into an argument with someone who thinks themselves better than me, but i’m bored so

        in what world, do you read the word “ratio” then see “7” and instantly go “ah yes, 7/1 can also be seen as 7:1”, instead of being confused for a bit because you expected a ratio

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It…specifically explains the part that you were confused about. Right there, below the title.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            you literally have to additionally imagine the rest of the ratio anyway. I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

            i give up, you either think yourself better than everyone to the point of refusing to acknowledge how the info graphic presents its information in an unintuitive way, or are OPs alt dying on this hill trying to defend your info graphic

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

              Does this prevent you in any way from comprehending the image? It takes more effort to parse out what you just said than it takes to understand the drawing. I still don’t understand why it’s relevant but that’s beyond the point.

              The image title could have said “MALE SUICIDES VS FEMALE SUICIDES (SKABADOO BANANAS WITH PAUL LEMON)” and you should still be able to immediately understand that farther right = more male suicides

              Hell you should be able to understand the gist of the image without even having any numbers on the bottom, just “less” on the left and “more” on the right.

              • shneancy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                seriously, are you deliberately acting like this or do you really not see how the way information is presented is not clear?

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I mean you can keep saying that but it doesn’t change the fact that you should have paid more attention in school