Kyle Davis (@linux_mclinuxface@fosstodon.org)
fosstodon.org
Attached: 1 image Welp. It's official. #Redis is no longer #OSS While I wasn't a contributor to the core, I presented on it dozens of times, talked to thousands, and wrote a book about it. I probably wouldn't have done any of that with that kind of license. Very disappointed.
  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    11·
    8 months ago

    The wording says “third-parties as a service”, so as long as Redis isn’t accessible by people outside your organization, it’s fine. But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

    • rbits
      2·
      8 months ago

      But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

      Where does it say this? I can’t see that in the SSPL

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        3·
        8 months ago

        It’s in the RSALv2:

        You may not make the functionality of the Software or a Modified version available to third parties as a service

        • rbits
          4·
          8 months ago

          Ah right. You could do a paid Redis service if you use the SSPL license though, right?

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            4·
            8 months ago

            That does seem to be the case. As long as any modifications to the source are publicly available. Which is pretty reasonable.