• blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You live in make believe world where you think your ideas change reality. Tell me how abstaining and allowing Trump to get elected, makes your life better? Fuck all the other people you’re fucking over, literally killing, in some cases. YOU. WHAT DO YOU GAIN FROM A TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN JAN?

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      abstaining from voting for genocidal geriatrics is doing the right thing. it’s an end in itself.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        So the 66% of the population who don’t vote for no particular reason at all are, “doing the right thing.”

          • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It’s functionally the same. All you’ve done is exclude yourself from the system just like what the majority of people do every cycle.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              that’s a consequentialist view of ethics, and one to which i don’t subscribe

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  nonconsequentialist ethics are strongly preferred by professional philosophers, so someone here might be ignorant, but it’s not me.

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Removed, rule 3:

                  “Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            No it isn’t. You’re not standing out or standing up. Nobody knows the difference why you stayed home and let Trump get elected.

              • blazeknave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                And don’t affect change. You might as well never have been born, as far as your impact. So it sounds like this is actually only about your moral high ground. That’s cool. Means nothing when Trump is president. Brilliant plan.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      You live in make believe world where you think your ideas change reality

      No I believe my behavior changes reality. Not only that, you believe my behavior changes reality.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes. Your behavior changes things. Not how you imagine it. That’s why you’re dangerous.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              @mods this guy has told me to “shut the fuck up” multiple times, called me a “bastard” and here they are calling me a “terrorist”. Am I allowed to respond in kind or does this kind of behavior eventually result in a ban?

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Removed, literally for rule 3:

              “Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”