• phillaholic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You neglected to include what should be done with the terrorist group that started the conflict by invading and killing a thousand Israeli citizens. It’s like you’ve read one side of the conflicts view point and ignored the rest. So you know how many times two state solutions have been negotiated and why they fell through? It’s really difficult to compromise when some people don’t think Israel should even exist. I don’t expect you to solve it, it’s impossible. There’s hopefully some good news coming out today https://apnews.com/article/palestinians-abbas-israel-hamas-war-resignation-1c13eb3c2ded20cc14397e71b5b1dea5

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m no foreign policy expert, but a 2 state solution seems like the only viable solution that doesn’t involve a genocide and eradication of an entire country and people. Sure it might require international intervention to establish a DMZ like what happened towards the end of the Korean War (from a US perspective) but it would at least stop the senseless killing and greatly reduce the suffering that’s happening right now

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Better nuke the site from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure… no humans will keep killing humans in the name of one god or another. Make it all radioactive, done. One week’s warning.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Clearly that’s the ideal, but getting that done is next to impossible and many of the surrounding countries that are bank rolling Hamas don’t want to see peace. It’s very difficult to fight a war against terrorism. Afghanistan/later Iraq proved that.