• davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I haven’t read this, but it’s worth noting that the Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller NGOs are US military-intelligence-industrial complex cut-outs.

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, it reads like a cope. Just note the following from the article:

      Will access to, and adoption of, Chinese technologies lead to the diffusion of new distinctively “Chinese” norms and standards (such as Chinese conceptions of cyber sovereignty) or barriers to unfettered Western market access over the long run? Will these same technologies compromise national digital ecosystems and infrastructures, thereby allowing the PRC to access sensitive information surrounding Western technologies and military deployments in the region while imposing its own distinctively Chinese vision on the region? And to what extent will these processes of technoscientific borrowing embolden authoritarianism and potentially take these states out of a Western security orbit?

      Meanwhile, Saudi officials had nothing but positives to say about the technology deals with China, and they said they tried pursuing the same with Western countries for years to no avail.