• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not at all what I meant. All of the characters regardless of their gender or ethnicity are coming from that point of view. Again still a good show and I am a white male but it’s a bit tone deaf on some things I would expect someone as smart as House to be aware of, and they likely would’ve included that were the show made today and not 2003

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Huh. Cutty and foreman in particular really openly disagree with…almost everything house opines on, and call him out often. Infact even other white males like Wilson are pretty clear they find his speech and actions inappropriate

      Edit: did I lie?

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        And yet House keeps his job and continues practicing despite his constant extremely inappropriate conduct.

        • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          “You’re fired for inappropriate medical conduct, illegal activity (breaking and entering, etc.), substance abuse, harassment, and littering.”

          Show ends after the pilot episode. Is that what you’re looking for?

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean I’d also take him undergoing some actual improvement as a person, but sure that would be better than him constantly getting away with being a horrible person and it being hand-waved with “he’s just too good to lose” never mind how badly he would tank the reputation of the hospital and would be more of a liability than an asset even with his talent.

            • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Oh but that’s not nearly as dramatic as prescribing Santa cigarettes for the shits, or letting a minor teenager get pre-sexual with him. The audience must have their fix! ARE THEY NOT ENTERTAINED‽

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah cause he’s the main character

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            A couple of other characters complaining means absolutely nothing when the main character is constantly rewarded for his behaviour by the narrative.

            • GBU_28
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Again, he’s the main character. I already addressed that. Not uncommon for the narrative to both reward, and challenge the main character.

              • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                You’re treating that as a magic term that reflects all criticism. Being the main character doesn’t mean he should be immune to any and all consequences of his actions without ever having to change and improve as a person.