• arymandias@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago
    1. Hamas is not taking part in Eurovision.
    2. A war crime is a war crime and a genocide is a genocide, no matter the justification.
    3. Calling Hammas the aggressor ignores quite a bit of complicated history.
    • SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Hamas is the aggressor in this specific part of the almost 100 year old conflict, that resulted in the current circumstances.

      What genocide are you referring to?

      • arymandias@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        None in particular, I’m saying there is no excuse for genocide. So to determine if Israel is committing one, the actions of Hamas are irrelevant.

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, if you cut it like that, you could cut it a month later. Now Israel is the aggressor!

        It’s not that simple.

      • Fiona@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        By that logic the specific part of the current genocide in Gaza Israel is the unambiguous aggressor.

        Like: You cannot just ignore what came before. WTF?

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Conflict” makes it sound like a dispute. Let’s call it what REALLT is: apartheid, occupation, and ethnic cleansing.