• doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If you don’t enforce indoor only cats with high precision then feral cats exist everywhere as a result.

    Literally no environment benefits from thousands of fucking cats.

    You will look for any excuse to avoid the guilt of our failures as a species.

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      owning pets isn’t about maximizing environmental benefits. your own existence is a much larger problem for that but no one is telling you to live your entire life in a boring box because we have too many humans. this hill is not important enough to warrant all you folks dying on it.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If some people can’t minimize harm to the environment (and as a result, harm done to countless other people) then those people need their rights restricted. That’s the fundamental nature of laws: if you fuck it up for the rest of us then we’re going to have to step in.

        • fosho@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          which apparently doesn’t extend to harming cats by way of imprisonment.