Once, drug dealers and money launderers saw cryptocurrency as perfectly untraceable. Then a grad student named Sarah Meiklejohn proved them all wrong—and set the stage for a decade-long crackdown.

“This is the story of the revelation in late 2013 that Bitcoin was, in fact, the opposite of untraceable—that its blockchain would actually allow researchers, tech companies, and law enforcement to trace and identify users with even more transparency than the existing financial system.”

  • circuscritic@lemmy.caEnglish
    1316·
    10 months ago

    You said drug empires, not guy selling 8 balls and 10 packs on a darknet market.

    I’m not going to provide sourcing for my throw away comment. Take it, or leave it, doesn’t really matter to me.

    • maness300@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1115·
      10 months ago

      You said drug empires, not guy selling 8 balls and 10 packs on a darknet market.

      Yeah, because those are the ones LE focuses on. So we can agree that players both big and small are able to cash out on cryptocurrency and your initial point is wrong.

      I’m not going to provide sourcing

      Lol, okay. You can just admit you don’t have one.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.caEnglish
        1113·
        10 months ago

        You got me, I’m just making this shit up. I have never even heard of any of the publicly available blockchain forensics databases, or reviewed any of the ample examples of reporting and analysis on the subject.

        If this was some obtuse or obscure subject, I’d take the time to cite sources, but it’s not, it’s extremely well covered, so stop being a lazy twat and look for yourself.

        • maness300@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1211·
          10 months ago

          I have never even heard of any of the publicly available blockchain forensics databases, or reviewed any of the ample examples of reporting and analysis on the subject.

          That’s not what I asked about and you know it.

          I asked how you know about vendor money laundering techniques, which you failed to provide a source for.

          it’s extremely well covered

          If that’s the case, then you should be able to easily provide a source instead of flailing around like you’re doing now.

          so stop being a lazy twat and look for yourself.

          You made the claim. You provide the source or you admit you’re making stuff up.

          • pandapoo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            21·
            10 months ago

            Are you actually asking someone to prove that large darknet market drug dealers use money laundering to safely access their profits?

            It sounds like what you really want is someone to explain to you how it’s done successfully…if you’re that desperate to learn, take it to Dread and off Lemmy.

                • maness300@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  14·
                  10 months ago

                  Are you going to link to a specific post, or just the whole forum and pretend that satisfies the criteria of ‘source’?

                  Hey guys! I found a source for everything! It’s called Google. Just cite it at the end of all your papers.

                  Why is it so difficult for you people to admit you make stuff up without a source? Lol.

                  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                    21·
                    10 months ago

                    You’re something special.

                    Okay kid, if this was all about you wanting to feel like you won an argument because people are declining to act as your personal Spotify Crime Explained playlist generator, then you win.