Is this my nerdiest post? Yes. Anyway,

The Star Trek wiki had something interesting…

Paul Schneider modeled the Romulans on the ancient Romans, naming the species’ homeworlds after the mythical founders of Rome, Romulus and Remus. “It was a matter of developing a good Romanesque set of admirable antagonists that were worthy of Kirk,” Schneider related. “I came up with the concept of the Romulans which was an extension of the Roman civilization to the point of space travel, and it turned out quite well.” (Captains’ Logs: The Unauthorized Complete Trek Voyages, p. 34) D.C. Fontana reckoned that Schneider basing the aliens on the pre-existing Roman civilization was the cause for the writer receiving insufficient credit for creating the Romulans. (“Balance of Terror” Starfleet Access, TOS Season 1 Blu-ray) Gene Roddenberry, interested in ancient Rome himself, approved of the initial depiction of the Romulan species. “He loved Paul’s having endowed the enemy-Romulans with the militaristic character of the ancient Romans,” wrote John D.F. Black and Mary Black. (Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 2, Issue 11, p. 19) Roddenberry’s original concept of the Romulans, however, was that they represented 1960s’ Chinese Communists.

Yes, Romulans are somewhat based on the Roman Empire and are xenophobic conquerers, but Westerners often ignorantly attribute these traits to communist countries anyway.

Then there is the Klingons, again, the Klingons are nothing like communists, (they’re a patriarchal empire) and yet I’ve seen people say they were based on the Soviets.

So what do you think?

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Gene had entirely incoherent political views and was for most of his life a booze and pill addled mess trying to make a buck and saying whatever the person nearest to him wanted to hear, near the end of his life, his Frank Reynolds phase where he got TNG and was back on top he had let fan worship seep into his brain and tried to make the vision he told everyone he had, which was different depending on the audience so it was utopian but also totally incoherent.