• Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    which by some weird thought process becomes a pro-Russian position.

    I am a communist and the prevailing attitude in most circles I am in is not an explicitly pro-Russian one, it’s just not explicitly pro-Ukraine either. There is a also an underlying understanding of the reasons why the war started. Just because you don’t support one side does not mean you have to 100% uncritically support the opposing side. The sooner we stop thinking of everything in black/white terms of Team A vs Team B, we will be a lot better off.

    Now there are those who have nostalgia for the USSR, which is not the modern Russian Federation, but it’s fairly niche. Usually people understand that modern Russia is not the soviet union. There are the patsocs too, but we don’t really claim them.

    I am not the Official Spokesman of Communism, but those are generally the attitudes I have seen in most of my circles.

    • steltek
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A world without “Teams” would be more productive but that’s not how humans work, sadly. Another problem is assuming the worst in a situation.

      For example, one could see a lot of rule-breaking behavior occurring and a lack of moderator intervention. It’s very easy to jump to the negative conclusion that this is favoritism from the mods. A more positive outlook would be that the moderators are overwhelmed with new members and more mods are needed, preferably from “the other side” for balance. (Not volunteering, I def do not have that level of free time or commitment to refereeing politics, blech!).

    • Akasazh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fairly niche? Most of the lemmygrad people are outright idolizing every totalitarian ‘marxist’ regime of the past century.

      I totally get left ideology and do agree with Marx’ ideology, but I’ve never understood how simping for autocrats fits into that.

      When I read that Lemmy had an active communist group I was looking forward to that, but the vehemence of the debate and the apologetic whitewashing of history really turned me off.

      So yeah, please a debate that isn’t so black and white is very welcome imho.