More aimed at the left, but a good read

  • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    That was a good read. Well written and informative, but now I am left with so many questions.

    That map was eye-opening. It made me wonder why republican controlled areas are doing so poorly. I understand the blame is somehow put on those dang ole democrats, but this doesn’t make sense to me. In all the towns with republican mayors and republican council members, in republican counties in states with republican governors and republican legislatures, with republican controlled congress for much of our recent history, why are so many republican citizens unable to prosper? We have had a string of republican presidents, among which I count Clinton, who was policy-wise, basically a moderate republican. So why are republican areas of the country not doing well? It’s mystifying.

    Could it possibly be because of…republican policy?

    • HitlerCunnyRape
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      In all the towns with republican mayors and republican council members, in republican counties in states with republican governors and republican legislatures, with republican controlled congress for much of our recent history, why are so many republican citizens unable to prosper?

      Vote for whoever or whatever you want, it won’t magically make a town economically prosperous. Democrats won’t bring deep water shipping ports to nowhereville. Progressive policies won’t bring back small towns where the resources dried up. That stuff just isn’t how it works.

      Could it possibly be because of…republican policy?

      Like the republican policy under Reagan and Schwarzenegger that significantly contributed to making California into the economic powerhouse it is today? Or are we just supposed to ignore that because it doesn’t fit your narrative?

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    …yeah…this is undeniable.

    It feels good to dismiss people, to mock them, to write them off as deplorables. But you might as well take time to try to understand them, because I’m telling you, they’ll still be around long after Trump is gone.

    This is basically the reason I bother to listen to conservatives. That bit in the article about rural having taken a beating is absolutely true, too. And when elites and my foolish economics professors believe people follow the jobs, that just not true for so, so many people. So, building any policy around people flocking to jobs when when their wings have been clipped since birth doesn’t fly.

    Furthermore, the Democratic party does not have a rural presence. They’ve effectively abandoned rural areas to conservatives in favor of corporations and empty progressive rhetoric. So, it’s no surprise that rural areas overwhelmingly vote Republican. It’s not like voting against their interests. This is a common liberal belief that’s not true. Rural interests aren’t legislatively represented by either party. Still, Republicans talk a big rhetorical game that resonates with them.

    This is one of the reasons I really do hate the Democratic party. Biden’s going on a tour about how American democracy is at risk. For who? A rural person and a poor person get fucked alike no matter who wins. What is democracy exactly when life is just a sequence of work-sleep-work-sleep?

    Ooof. I’m riled up. God, I hate the Democratic party.

    But you still won’t catch me dead voting for Republicans.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      A rural person and a poor person get fucked alike no matter who wins

      Often they are the same.

      That’s why Trump message of brining back manufacturing goes over so well in the rural areas. It provided them a decent life.

      NAFTA devastated rural areas. Both parties voted for it. Robert reich knew it would destroy unions and it did. Why I find it funny liberals circle jerking over reich. When had a chance to stand up for labor. He didn’t.

      Unions are weak because a company can just move to China or Mexico.

  • tsonfeir
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    the godless disease

    I mean, most of the left would consider god the disease.