• PotentiallyAnApricot@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I really struggle to take seriously what these tech people say about ‘not wanting to censor’. They made a business calculation, and maybe an ideological one, and decided “we want that nazi money, it’s worth it to us.” which really tells you everything about a company and how it is likely to approach other issues, too.

    • FlumPHP@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.

      • intensely_human
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.

        So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      What do you call a company that puts profits above all? A company.

      Last time I asked for advice about registering a nonprofit, I was told “but you don’t yet have enough profits to use a nonprofit for tax evasion” 😒

      • NumbersCanBeFun@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not sure I understand your point here. Everyone from a sole proprietor to a mega corporation is in it for profit. Just because the upper one percent is dodgy as hell and plays fast and loose with the tax code doesn’t mean every single company in existence is terrible or out to do sketchy business. I’m pretty happy with mine. I wouldn’t be there if I wasn’t working with honest people.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          My point is that it’s nothing to be surprised about when a company makes a decision to increase its profit.

          As for the rest, getting a profit from your work, is called “a job”. Companies are created to get a profit in excess of whatever job the owners are doing, otherwise it’s called a “non-profit”… for the owners in excess of their job at the company, which they still get paid for.

          I don’t know the company you’re working for, but if it has any profits that don’t revert to the people doing the job, or the amortization of the initial investment, then the owners are “skimming off the top” from everyone.

          The people I asked for advice, from the corporate world, were so entrenched in that same “profit first” mentality, that they couldn’t even grasp the idea of only getting paid for your actual work, and only saw non-profits as a tool for tax evasion.

    • intensely_human
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What on earth can you be smoking to think it’s profitable move to publicly announce that Nazis are welcome on your platform? There is zero profit incentive in that. Nazi money is not much money.