This iconic mouse is weeks away from being in the public domain
www.deseret.com
Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when ‘Steamboat Willie’ enters the public domain

This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when ‘Steamboat Willie’ enters the public domain

  • PottedPlant@lemmy.worldEnglish
    213·
    11 months ago

    The public must gain it’s share of the revenue for allowing a private company to use public domain IP exclusively.

    Hold a yearly auction to see who is granted rights to the property which is now the public’s.

    • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
      428·
      11 months ago

      The public must gain it’s share of the revenue for allowing a private company to use public domain IP exclusively.

      Pretty strongly disagree with the idea of a company’s product just becoming the public’s because a certain amount of time has passed.

      I cannot even conceive of what the argument for this could possibly be.

      • ZephyrXero@lemmy.worldEnglish
        30·
        11 months ago

        Copyright was never meant to be used how it is today. It was specifically made to protect small creators from having big companies come in and rip them off. Companies were never meant to be the beneficiaries. But lot of lobbying plus corporations are people too bullshit changed that.

        Copyright is meant to last roughly the lifetime of the artist, but organizations can live forever. And then nothing ever goes in the public domain, a shared culture dissolves in to nothingness.

        • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
          125·
          11 months ago

          Copyright is meant to last roughly the lifetime of the artist, but organizations can live forever.

          This is why I think it needs to be updated.

          And then nothing ever goes in the public domain, a shared culture dissolves in to nothingness.

          I don’t see how these two things relate to one another at all. We currently have a shared culture.

      • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        11 months ago

        Disney themselves benefited from the public domain since they didn’t invent the stories of Snow White, Cinderella, etc.

        • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
          13·
          11 months ago

          They didn’t tell them as-written, either, so this is neither here nor there.

          • hark@lemmy.worldEnglish
            51·
            11 months ago

            You don’t have to remake steamboat willie frame-by-frame either.

      • adrian783@lemmy.worldEnglish
        71·
        11 months ago

        the argument is that the people, and the political system the people put in place enabled the company to create and benefit off its creations.

        “we live in a society” but unironically.

        • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
          118·
          11 months ago

          enabled the company to create and benefit off its creations.

          And you want to… Stop that?

                • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  110·
                  11 months ago

                  How are the two at odds here? Disney has around a quarter million employees who currently benefit from copyrighted IPs.

                  • TomAwsm@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    41·
                    11 months ago

                    Please explain how Disney being the only ones able to use an IP causes their employees to get a higher salary. Executives do not count, as they get paid obscene amounts as it is anyway.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        22·
        11 months ago

        Literally how it’s worked forever, how do you think books and films become public domain? Blame the Romans.

        • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
          412·
          11 months ago

          “this is the way it’s always been” is never an acceptable defense of anything

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            10·
            11 months ago

            I’m confused, are you actually advocating for companies to retain control of their properties forever? Public domain exists for the benefit of all people, to keep knowledge and art open and available, and to allow future generations to build on existing work.

            Sure not a huge deal for Mickey mouse because it’s not as important as research work or whatever, BUT considering Disney was literally built on repacking public domain stories (Pinocchio / Snow White / Beauty and Beast directly taken from previous works, Lion King is basically Hamlet with animals), it’s past time they contributed back.

            • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
              110·
              11 months ago

              Sure not a huge deal for Mickey mouse because it’s not as important as research work or whatever, BUT considering Disney was literally built on repacking public domain stories (Pinocchio / Snow White / Beauty and Beast directly taken from previous works, Lion King is basically Hamlet with animals), it’s past time they contributed back.

              I’m not sure how updating IP laws get in the way of this and no one seems able to article it for me.

              And yes, I believe that any trademark characters/IPs should be protected forever. I don’t see how letting me write and publish independent Doctor Who stories benefits anyone but me, while damaging the “real” Doctor Who universe.

              Do you have a reason for the alternative view?

              • CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                11·
                11 months ago

                For me it’s quite simple. The options are offering timed control over an IP, or have the wild west of no copywrite. We, as a society, decided we will protect an IP for said time to allow profit and encourage creation, before the public can go wild on it. Without copywrite protections, derivative works are available immediately.

                Under this perpetual exclusive rights system/scenario you’re proposing Disney straight up does not exist. Whichever company held the rights to the Brothers Grimm estate would have immediately cease and desisted Disney’s Snow White. No Disney, no Mouse, end of story.

                Now, that works out great for Current Day Media Giant - but what about tomorrow’s creators, the next Disney that builds it’s foundation on stories like Frozen or Moana? Shouldn’t those future generations be provided similar access to their childhood fables? It starts with making Steamboat Willie available.

                • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  19·
                  11 months ago

                  The options are offering timed control over an IP,

                  I don’t understand why this shouldn’t be perpetual if the IP is in use.

                  but what about tomorrow’s creators, the next Disney that builds it’s foundation on stories like Frozen or Moana?

                  “Misunderstood and somewhat outcast princess that develops special powers and saves her people” is hardly off-limits.

                  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                    51·
                    11 months ago

                    Implying there is no difference between derivative works and reimagining. Let me use another example- 100 years from now a creator has a great idea to release a story expanding Harry Potter to introduce a new school, idk.

                    Under your proposed system, this creator now needs to get a license, or build an entire off-brand wizarding world? You seem believe taking “inspiration” from public works is ok, while using or expanding the preexisting works is not. Meanwhile in reality all works are derivative of SOMETHING that came before it, and rights holders, while Potter is still under copywrite, will absolutely C&D my new movie “Jerry Plopter and the Warlock’s Boulder”, even though my story is “totally original” about Jerry’s first year at Noxorth.

                    If you don’t see the problem here I have to concluded you’re either a trolling contrarian, or the type that votes to defund libraries.