My friend is a customer service rep who is ready to retire. Her company is talking about layoffs with 13+ weeks of severance, but when she asked (anonymously) if they were accepting volunteers, they said no. In case she’s not one of the ones told to clean out her desk, what are the ways she could get terminated while preserving her ability to claim unemployment (which would equal the 13 weeks of severance)?

UPDATE: She took my advice and saw her doctor. He agreed that she’s experiencing a job-related stress injury, set her up with a Disability claim, and referred her for psychiatric counseling.

  • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s important to note that, barring something egregious, single instances don’t meet the with cause definition.

    There has to be documented history that the issue was raised with you and addressed (verbal warnings, write ups etc.)

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, it doesn’t. A single occurrence of being late, or the first instance of being talked to about job performance does not meet the requirement of cause to deny you unemployment benefits.

        An employer has to demonstrate repeated occurrences with documentation to be able to justify denying unemployment. Without that they can contest your claim but as soon as you appeal it they will be overruled unless they can show a repeated pattern with corrective action documentation.

        • Usul_00_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          This varies by location. I’ve been through it on both sides in a few states, and when working with an employment lawyer one of the most crucial things he said was to make sure the filing was in the beneficial state.

    • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Also worth noting that most companies prefer to treat any given firing as “without cause” because stating a reason is usually a net-loss in terms of legal exposure.

      Exceptions to the rule include, but are not limited to:

      • States which make it expensive/slow to fire without cause (because money)
      • Union jobs (because union)
      • Retaliative firings (because worker’s rights)
      • Prejudiced firings (because civil rights)

      How does one tell if they’re on the road to a with-cause termination? Simple: documentation. If you’re suddenly being put under a microscope it might indicate that a premeditated f-bomb is hiding around the corner.

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly! Documentation is the best indicator, usually escalating from verbal, to written and then to final. A PIP, performance improvement plan, is another good indicator you’re on the block.