• BearOfaTime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The encryption doesn’t have to be compromised when their app does the message scanning before encrypting.

    Technically it’s still E2EE

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure, but at that point, it’s a legitimate question of what goal you’re trying to satisfy with E2EE. This doesn’t prevent metadata analysis being used for marketing purposes - and if that’s something you’re strongly against, that’s perfectly fair - but it does make it completely impossible for message content to be provided to law enforcement, even in the face of a warrant. That is hugely powerful, because we’ve already seen cases of FB Messenger texts being used to go after women who get abortions, just for one example. In countries with truly oppressive governments, that benefit can’t be overstated.

      Sure, Facebook will try to sell you some shit, but they’re not going to send the police to arrest you. Having E2EE is a strict improvement over the status quo, and if you do care deeply about privacy on the more commercial side, there’s always Signal or other privacy-first services.

      • LWD
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nothing technically would prevent that, but eventually that evidence would end up in public court and the ruse would be up.

          • LWD
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            deleted by creator