• NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    No they don’t. Good lord keep the conversation honest.

    Aoc comitted several ethical issues and you are cheer her on. She also “faked” her arrest.

    Both sides are slimey and both sides protect their side

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Aoc comitted several ethical issues and you are cheer her on. She also “faked” her arrest.

      Could you show me where I cheer her on?

      If you want to, you can list a couple of the ethical issues you speak of. If they are actual ethical issues, I’ll disavow her here and now.

      But I can’t imagine that they rise to the utter shit-show that was Santos, who - again - is STILL supported by the majority of house republicans.

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why the what aboutism? Everyone says santos must go. I’ve yet to see anyone defend his actions.

        Santos goes beyond politics.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The majority of house republicans wants him to stay. Literally, more house republicans disagree with what you just wrote than agree with it.

          But again, I’m not trying to employ any whataboutisms here. List some of AOCs ethical issues, and I’ll disavow her here and now.