I honestly do not understand their rating system. Every one of them looks to have exactly the same rating (Mozilla says 👎, People voted super creepy), but then they have a sort by least or most creepy. What gives?
Edit: nevermind looks like there are some that are “very creepy”. This rating system is kind of obtuse.
Because they are all creepy, and not one of those companies give a damn about privacy or security…and why should they? Companies can’t get in trouble for anything ever…
all of the cars got voted down, so the filters don’t make much sense. They’re supposed to be used with other product categories which are less creepy, too.
Makes me wonder if anyone out there is maintaining a list of (I can’t believe I’m about to say this) privacy-respecting cars
Mozilla does
https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/
I honestly do not understand their rating system. Every one of them looks to have exactly the same rating (Mozilla says 👎, People voted super creepy), but then they have a sort by least or most creepy. What gives?
Edit: nevermind looks like there are some that are “very creepy”. This rating system is kind of obtuse.
Because they are all creepy, and not one of those companies give a damn about privacy or security…and why should they? Companies can’t get in trouble for anything ever…
I love the idea but hate how Mozilla did this
yeah the rating system is poorly executed. the articles on the other hand are quite a good read.
all of the cars got voted down, so the filters don’t make much sense. They’re supposed to be used with other product categories which are less creepy, too.
Mozilla’s “least to most creepy” ranking is the best resource I’ve found so far:
https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/
I would think most cars before 2010 should be okay. Infotainment was pretty rudimentary at that point
Infotainment? Do you mean adverdataharvestment?
Yeah, that’s pretty accurate