Don’t know the best way to put this but ill try.

As much as I love this country, we have fallen soo far behind. I don’t want to get to political, but I think Labour tried to fix it in one way, now Nat will try the other. Neither will work in the time they have.

We always prided ourselves on our past accomplishments- women vote, Hillary, Rutherford, Nuclear Free, Maori Batallion - and what we are as a country - massive dairy producers, amazing tourist destination, friendly people. But we have dwelled on it too long and got complacent. Our desire to repeat our past success has made us miss opportunities that require years of investment, and meant we are now in a cultural and economic hole that will be increasingly difficult, expensive and time consuming to get ourselves out from.

We have a tiny population and limited housing in an empty country where people have limited desire and finances for kids. Massive farms that produce income for a few overseas investors or historic families. Massively increasing inflation and cost of living due to our long supply chains and small industry base, especially compared to overseas. Falling education at a time we needs teachers, medical persons, engineers and tradies… unis are slashing courses, councils are running out of money, and overseas investors will funnel more out of the country.

I just want others thoughts around this - I have multiple ideas and theories, but I want to hear from you all.

  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like this one is an egg or chicken arguement - you could also argue that because each individual provides such a small amount of economic value compared to other countries (reference back in 2010 was ~80k per capita vs 300k-3mil overseas) we can’t provide the wages, or tax revenue to grow.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      You could try to argue that, but one option (high wages) lead to higher productivity because it incentivises investment in staff and tools.

      Keeping wages low does nothing to incentivise investment in higher productivity, so productivity stays low.

      One option is better for companies (keep existing profits), the other is better for the country (lower short term profits until productivity rises).